TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 APS-C Manual Focus Camera Lens Super Large Aperture Retro Style Light Weight Camera Lens for Fuji X Mount

Product Information

I agree completely. Sold all my Fuji lenses not just because of the crap manual focus, but also because I don’t share the common wisdom that such lenses as the xf 35mm 1.4 is so wonderful. In fact compared to my various vintage lenses, as well as 7art and ttart ones, I find it to have a soulless look that gives me no positive emotions. If you haven’t yet you might also try the ttartisans 23mm 1.4. between it and the 7artisans 35mm one could spend a lifetime of photography happily. Also,I don’t understand the need for focus “aids ” turn the ring until the desired focus is achieved visually. Or does everyone have terrible, uncorrected eyesight? The all-metal construction makes for a solid feel and all-in-all everything to this point should make you smile as it feels quite premium. TTArtisan 35mm f/0.95 in Action

35mm f/0.95 Review | 5050 Travelog 7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 Review | 5050 Travelog

As a consequence of your camera nerdery, you may have acquired a fetish for so called “ultra-fast” prime lenses, such as the Canon “Dream” lens, or one of the most widely lusted after and expensive examples, the Leica Noctilux 50mm 0.95 I did two street photography sessions with the 7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 for this review and for both sessions I was surprised by the number of keepers I had with shots in focus. I also missed a few but as a rule, most photos were okay. What is your experience using mf focus? I came across your 35mm 7art review and I already own them. At 0.95 it’s quite difficult to mf, the dof is too thin, and in the article I saw you mentioned easy focusing, please share it, thank you. It is obvious that there are slower lenses that offer higher resolution, contrast and generally better correction of optical aberrations.At max aperture and close distances (0.5m-1.0m), both have that v soft focus rendering, plus plenty of "glow". On my 7A, by about 2m, that glow is virtually gone, but soft rendering + slightly low contrast remains.. Stopping down to f1.4 sees an improvement, and good by f2.

TT Artisan vs 7artisan | FujiX-Forum TT Artisan vs 7artisan | FujiX-Forum

So I’ve gone from XC-zooms to fast vintage primes, to Fuji’s XF-primes to a third party Fuji X manual lens. And now I have a conclusion. And from here on, it could be good for you to know I’m an X-Pro shooter. I own an X-Pro3 and an X-Pro1. The latter is more of a B&W toy. I would love to write something more about another time. We will be looking at 100% crops from the 24mp Sony A7III and the Leica M10. Both cameras do not have an anti aliasing filter in front of the sensor. 2.1m distance (24mp Sony A7III vs 24mp Leica M10) Thanks for yet another well done review. I have compared this and the Zhong Yi (for M mount) again and again, but can’t decide on any of them. When shooting in low-light environments, image quality is often sacrificed by increasing the ISO and decreasing the shutter speed. However, using the large F0.95 aperture can solve the issues caused by low light and allow you to experience the beauty of the night without compromising image quality. If you focus on something farther the Zhong Yi lenses are slightly sharper and the bokeh also renders a bit smoother.When stopping the lens down you can still catch all kinds of ghosts and also some rainbow artifacts with the sun close to the corner of the frame: Sony A7rII | TTArtisan 50mm 0.95 | f/8.0 Free YouTube Search Tool – Sign up to the blog newsletter to get a free copy of my YouTube video search tool database. Search my 270+ videos with ease Compared to the mentioned Leica Noctilux and Voigtlander Nokton fast 50mm lenses I feel the TTArtisan lens offers great value for money. Actually not mentioned enough is are these F0.95 lenses ‘sharp’ at F0.95. This is 1 reason why these very fast lenses are expensive if made well. In this sense the TTArtisan is better than the 7Artisans and I understand the newly released Meike version. The TTArtisan is not very sharp of course but sharp enough imo. There is little point in buying a F0.95 lens when I can’t shoot wide open. Fujis 35mm f1.4 is absolutely awesome, no doubt about that. But it miss the feeling you get in the 7artisan. As you say, somethings missing and a slower phase is not always bad 😀

TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 review – is this ‘the’ Noctilux for TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 review – is this ‘the’ Noctilux for

One often overlooked aspect of Chinese fast lenses is the actual F/T-stop of the lens. (not just Chinese fast lenses, f1.2 is a very ambiguous aperture, frequently used for f1.29) I tested this lens for center brightness in a controlled setting & 0.95 is at least 1EV faster than 1.4, the manufacturer is not cheating, this is a true F1 lens. The same cannot be said about the Mitakon 35mm 0.95 mk2? lens that I’ve owned before. That lens offered about 1/3rd of a stop illumination difference between wide open & 1.4. The light-vacuuming ability of the TTArtisan effectively compensates for the rather sad maximum usable ISO of 640 on the Leica M8. If you would like the option of shooting at lower ISO (film or digital), this lens will get you there. I made images with this lens in near darkness that just would not be possible or usable with any other lens, and in these conditions the worst of its characteristics, such as CA, are less of a concern. If you mainly want to shoot at f/1.4 I would recommend to get an f/1.4 lens (e.g. the TTArtisan 50mm 1.4) as it will save you money, bulk and the opening will be perfectly round at f/1.4.

For me you would buy the Voigtländer 50 f1 or the modern Leica Noctilux 50 0.95 if you need the fast aperture and want modern rendering. They would suit people looking for a fast but useable maximum aperture without excess character. ( I’m being over critical, both lenses are amazing but lens character than TTArtisan and older Noctilux). Artistic and imperfect

A Review of the New TTArtisan 35mm f/0.95 Lens | Fstoppers

on the APSC-sized Fujifilm X-mount sensor, a 35mm lens gives an equivalent view of 50mm at a 1.5x crop factor, hence the mention of the Noctilux in the title. The TTArtisan 50mm 0.95 is not a great choice for stopped down landscape shooting but I do not think anyone expected it to be. Hi Bram, it is best to explain what I mean using some sample photos I have taken: JPG links here: http://curtispatterson.com/Voigtlander50mm12asphVM_NikonZ6/ Nevertheless, I would not recommend to rely on the rangefinder when using this lens at wider apertures, the depth of field is too shallow to consistently get decent results.

As mentioned above the aperture ring is very easily moved out of position. It has the same amount of friction as the focus ring and the same grooves. A few times I actually mistook it for the focus ring. At wider apertures these values are comparable to the dreadful Zenitar 50mm 0.95 E and about 1.5 EV worse compared to the Zhong Yi 50mm 0.95 E-mount lenses. I prefer going from ƒ1.4 onwards on this lens, while I am sure some users will be keen on the rendering at ƒ0.95. This lens will be reviewed on the 42mp Sony A7rII and the 24mp Leica M10. Sample Images Leica M10 | TTArtisan 50mm 0.95 | f/0.95 Sony A7rII | TTArtisan 50mm 0.95 | f/0.95 Sony A7rII | TTArtisan 50mm 0.95 | f/5.6 If you plan to use this lens on a Leica M film camera I would recommend using neutral density filters as a maximum shutter speed of 1/1000 is not enough from a bright day and a fast lens. Even the Leica M240 maximum shutter speed of 1/4000 isn’t really fast enough. I love the Leica SL with 1/16000 and ISO 50. I used the lens without ND filters with this setup.