The Armchair General: Can You Defeat the Nazis?

Product Information

They both realized early on than one world couldn't destroy the other without knocking themselves out of orbit. Worse yet, there are a fair number of Americans (of Irish descent or otherwise) who loudly proclaim their support for the IRA or PIRA from across the ocean, often despite never having set foot in Ireland- much less taken actual action of any kind. Jack Ryan is an author of books on naval history and a CIA analyst, but he winds up rolling up his sleeves and going face-to-face with Captain Ramius. However, through a mixture of miscommunications, her awesome skills, and God screwing with her, she remains in the front line.

The men responsible for organizing the Battle of Yonkers in World War Z were armchair military types. As these are told from the viewpoint of the frontline troops, high command generally shows a level of incompetence rarely seen outside the Imperial Guard. He does not abort the mission when a copy of General Charette's plan gets stolen, probably by spies, and very likely falls to enemy hands. This trope is the entire point of the BBC game show Time Commanders, where random people off the street get to direct historical battles simulations (with help from historians and professional tacticians) to see if they can change the outcome of history.The emphasis on deploying and providing for all the armour, artillery, anti-air, and electronic warfare units meant that the infantrymen were allotted just a handful of ammunition each. In fact, he ends up as commander of the Human Expeditionary Army, although this is because only the U.

The overall outlook for an invasion isn’t as bad as is often suggested, at least on paper, but Buckley is careful to make clear that there were good reasons to put the invasion off until 1944. The only items that we cannot accept are earrings for pierced ears and perishable items, such as food or drink. Haig is shown at his headquarters to be playing with toy soldiers and discarding them with a dustpan, demonstrating zero concern for the soldiers under his command. Many cite the reason for his failure as having been a Scribe (scientist) before becoming an Elder, whereas most Elders are chosen from the ranks of Paladins (soldiers with considerable front-line experience). The book outlines the problems facing the Russians, then details what might have happened if the two sides agreed on a treaty.While he isn't necessarily on the front lines, he is personally present at nearly every battle he commands. He is the author of a number of books including Air Power in the Age of Total War and Monty's Men: The British Army and the Liberation. Bomber Command never had the technology for precision bombing and, while there was something to be said for developing a dive-bomber capability to match Germany, I doubt improving the bombing fleet to the point it could do real damage was feasible. He considers Chief Hanlon of the NCR Rangers to be a political rival and so does the exact opposite of whatever Hanlon suggests, even though it was Hanlon's strategy that won the First Battle for Hoover Dam. it not been for the magnificent material contributed by the Polish squadrons and their unsurpassed gallantry, I hesitate to say that the outcome of the Battle would have been the same.

Not only do the royal Vinsmokes command their armies, but they directly participate in their battles as well. Most of the "good guy" characters are disgusted by them, including Queen Elizabeth — you don't usually get a knighthood for assaulting your own diplomat, but if the man in question is a pompous, know-it-all idiot who was well on his way to ruining an alliance and possibly starting a second war. Pellew is disgusted that men (and among those are his own men for whose lives he feels responsible) are sent to die in a doomed mission. It's torn to shreds by the man being interviewed in the story, saying that most of the inappropriately chosen stuff was there for purely PR reasons. David Halberstam's The Best and the Brightest is about the decisions of America's military and foreign policy experts under the Kennedy and Johnson administrations that led to the US getting bogged down in Vietnam.On one hand, Stalin was strong because he allowed no strong followers (ensuring his successor wouldn’t share his powers); on the other, Stalin’s mistakes in the run up to the war were disastrous. Rumsfeld also either fully believed in (or actually helped create, depending on your viewpoint) the Bush Administration's view that a war against Iraq would be quick and easy, much to the annoyance of military men who remembered the last time the United States invaded a country and had to deal with hostile locals. And then you have Commander Kubrik Chenkov, whose only strategy is to throw more men at the enemy without armor or artillery support, whether the goal is to take a fortress or clear a minefield.