Thermalright TF7 2g Thermal Paste Compound for Coolers,Thermal conductivity is 12.8W/m.k-2 Grams, Graphic Card CPU Thermal Grease, Laptop Thermal Grease(TF7 2g)

Product Information

A good example of a skewed characteristic is how thermal paste with higher thermal conductivity doesn't provide better heat transfer efficiency. Logically, it stands to reason that for a thermal paste to have a high heat transfer efficiency, it would need a higher thermal conductivity. However, when taking other factors (such as the thin, flat, and even layer or viscosity) into consideration, we find that actually a thermal paste with high thermal conductivity performs worse than one with lower thermal conductivity if it cannot be spread in a thin layer. This is what we mean when we talk about thermal paste in a real-world scenario.

At the default PPT of 105W, the most intensive loads can be difficult to cool and result in the CPU running at TJMax with anything less than the strongest coolers. DeepCool’s LT720 and EKWB’s EK Elite coolers are the only two I’ve tested (yet) which can handle that much heat. As such, we’ll be looking at two metrics in this situation where coolers run with the CPU reaching TJMax (95c): Noise levels and watts cooled. Modern high-end CPUs, whether Intel or AMD, are difficult to cool in intensive workloads. In the past, reaching 95 degrees Celsius-plus on a desktop CPU was sually a cause for concern – but with today’s fastest processors, it is considered normal operation. Similar behavior has been present in laptops for years due to cooling limitations in tight spaces.ZF-EX is another great TIM for money, used that on my 5950X and on RTX 2080Ti Strix and Zotac RTX 2080Ti AMP and never had any problems with this TIM, didn't tested this TIM on RTX 3090 but I would suspect it would perform quite close to TFX or SYY-157 When choosing a thermal paste, factors such as heat transferability, ease of application, ability to support a thin, flat, and even layer, and electrical conductivity should be considered. Why does a thermal paste with high thermal conductivity not necessarily provide better heat transfer efficiency?

Gelid Extreme was popular a while ago and performs similar as TG or some others, but it's not available in stores recently. I'm asymbling my new "main" rig and ran into some trouble. Skipping the story, I had to remove my HSF from the CPU and will have to do it again for further troubleshooting. I used the thermal paste that it came with and when I reinstalled, I used the last of my Noctua NT-H1. Before you start posting about how bad it is and how great liquid metal is.... I also received some Streacom TX13 a while ago which works great on everything and spreads much better than most other TIMs. I used NT-H1 in my 3090 Eagle and the initial results were great with 70c just after repasting. However the temps kept climbing and now I'm around 80c after three months or so. In the past I’ve mentioned how my past testing of coolers had focused on Intel CPUs because they were the most challenging to cool and also consumed the most power. When Alder Lake was released, I noticed that the thermal difficulty of cooling the 12900K was more difficult compared to prior generation products – only a few coolers were able to keep it under TJMax.Kingpin KPx seems is one of the best TIM but sadly its not available here in UK, I got just small tube which I was using on one of the build and from tests, that paste would beat TFX or SYY-157 and ZF-EX maybe 1-2°C, I have built friend loop like 6 months ago and to the date temperatures are still okay and not increasing Measured the temperature of the CPU while using the thermal paste for the first 3 minutes while idle and calculated the idle average Liquid metal compounds are almost always electrically conductive, so while these compounds perform better than their paste counterparts, they require more focus and attention during application. They are very hard to remove if you get some in the wrong place, which would fry your system. However, the results were different when paired with AMD’s Ryzen 7700X – performing only on par with high end air cooling. For this reason, I recommend the Frozen Notte 240 for cooling Intel’s i9-13900k – but not AMD’s Ryzen 7700X. I slightly shopped out the fugly lines that Thermalright prints on their otherwise wonderful 12th Gen Correction frame. I couldn't stand looking at them. LOL.

Corsair Commander Pro, 100%/50% PWM Speed profiles (liquid cooling pump always @100%, if applicable) When I opened my card I found the NT-H1 was noticeably drier and was harder to remove on the die but still wet on the original extra squeeze. It was quite remarkable. It’s important to know these criteria because even if your thermal paste can support a high heat transferability, if it can’t be applied easily and evenly in a thin and flat layer, then that aspect can negate its heat-transferring qualities. Additionally, electrical conductivity will give you a hint as to how meticulous the application process will be overall. In this experiment, we tested the heat transferability of 9 different thermal pastes. With each thermal paste, we: Thermal compounds might always be compared and debated over, but the simple fact remains: PC system building needs thermal compounds to effectively dissipate thermal loads. Without them, our beloved gaming and content-producing machines would struggle to keep components cool during heated frag sessions, heavy workstation computations, or just simply browsing the web.We're also putting a new take on an old approach to the test — thermal pads. These pads can be used as TIM and come as a single sheet you simply apply to your heatsink, with Thermaltake's Heilos Pad being the first new thermal pad entrant to see our test bed in the coming weeks. As I’ve only had time to complete testing of eight coolers on AMD’s AM5 platform, the data I have is currently limited. This will grow as I continue to test coolers. For thermal paste application, we chose the 5-point method and allowed the thermal paste to be spread purely by the weight of the heatsink. The entire experiment was done in a fixed environment with 27oC room temperature.

CPUs have incorporated ever more cores. Chiplets and hybrid architectures have proliferated, moving the most thermally demanding bits away from the exact center of the integrated heat spreader / lid of the CPU. And despite shrinking manufacturing nodes, many processors have just gotten physically bigger. So while you used to be able to apply thermal paste basically the same way across all consumer manufacturers and platforms and expect great results, that's no longer the case. I know this is been asked a lot, but still there is no conclusive answer and is not easy to believe anything you read around this subject simply cause no one has done a long term review of multiple TIMs.It doesn't come with a screwdriver like some other coolers, but you don't need it because it has access to the mounting screws, unlike some coolers where you need to insert a long screw driver to a tiny hole All testing is performed at a 23C ambient room temperature. Multiple thermal tests are run on each CPU to test the cooler in a variety of conditions, and acoustic measurements are taken with each result. These tests include: In general, it looks like when you apply the TIM correctly, then everything rated at 10-17W/mk will give you +/- 1-2°C difference. For me it matters more so the TIM spreads well and I won't waste it too much to apply another time when something is wrong. It happens on large IHS when optimal is to spread it on the surface. If you use a "grain of rice" method then it won't cover the IHS. We're not saying the advice below is the absolute best method or the only correct method. We're just saying it works, and it's more or less what's recommended by PC thermal experts like Noctua and others. The results here were surprising to me, as I had expected the Frozen Notte to have better performance in comparison to air cooling based on my results with Intel’s i9-13900K. Default Power Limits