Statistics without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians

Product Information

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners. the possibility of bias in samples, the distinction between significance and importance, the fact that correlation does not imply causation, and that people sometimes simply get things wrong.' A sample may be defined as random if every individual in the population being sampled has an equal likelihood of being included. Random sampling is the basis of all good sampling techniques and disallows any method of selection based on volunteering or the choice of groups of people known to be cooperative.[ 3] have a stats test tomorrow, revising the concepts actually made sense.. very grateful but we will see how it goes Regardless, this should be the first book anyone should read if they want an introduction to the world of statistics. It contains no calculations and it is very engaging.

Statistics without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians Statistics without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians

Sometimes, a strictly random sample may be difficult to obtain and it may be more feasible to draw the required number of subjects in a series of stages. For example, suppose we wish to estimate the number of CATSCAN examinations made of all patients entering a hospital in a given month in the state of Maharashtra. It would be quite tedious to devise a scheme which would allow the total population of patients to be directly sampled. However, it would be easier to list the districts of the state of Maharashtra and randomly draw a sample of these districts. Within this sample of districts, all the hospitals would then be listed by name, and a random sample of these can be drawn. Within each of these hospitals, a sample of the patients entering in the given month could be chosen randomly for observation and recording. Thus, by stages, we draw the required sample. If indicated, we can introduce some element of stratification at some stage (urban/rural, gender, age). In statistics, a population is an entire group about which some information is required to be ascertained. A statistical population need not consist only of people. We can have population of heights, weights, BMIs, hemoglobin levels, events, outcomes, so long as the population is well defined with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. In selecting a population for study, the research question or purpose of the study will suggest a suitable definition of the population to be studied, in terms of location and restriction to a particular age group, sex or occupation. The population must be fully defined so that those to be included and excluded are clearly spelt out (inclusion and exclusion criteria). For example, if we say that our study populations are all lawyers in Delhi, we should state whether those lawyers are included who have retired, are working part-time, or non-practicing, or those who have left the city but still registered at Delhi. Only a short review here as others have written superbly on this book. I read this item cover to cover for a maths and algorithms university module and found it an excellent cornerstone to work on the rest of learning material. Like another reviewer here I've spent years running away from anything that looked remotely mathematical. Rowntree makes statistics more “human” by shedding away complicated statistical formulae and replacing them with robust conversations. He explores the concepts that these formulae describe, pausing throughout the book to ask questions that force you to think. This give-and-take approach made the book feel conversational, a momentous accomplishment in statistics in my view.

In retrospect, these appear to be mistakes. As an aspiring trader, my world is deeply tied to statistics and programming languages (although I still think “R” is ugly). Reading “Statistics Without Tears” slowly chipped away at my prejudice toward the subject. Derek Rowntree writes and educates in a way that I believe most statistics teachers can only dream of doing. Instead of dosing off during the book’s “lectures,” like I did in university ones (on the ones I didn’t skip), this book had me hooked from beginning to end.

Statistics Without Tears - Derek Rowntree PDF | PDF - Scribd Statistics Without Tears - Derek Rowntree PDF | PDF - Scribd

Ascertainment of a particular disease within a particular area may be incomplete either because some patient may seek treatment elsewhere or some patients do not seek treatment at all. Focus group discussions (qualitative study) with local people, especially those residing away from the health center, may give an indication whether serious underreporting is occurring. A brief and informative read that helped me review the statistics material I had studied, but I need to qualify that by saying this will not be enough. It's a good starting point, and if you've studied statistics before then it will remind you of the terms and help you conceptually. However, you will need to supplement this with other reading and practice centred around why you want to understand statistics and the tools you want to use. BOPA presents a 6 part live e-learning Statistics Webinar series to help you understand and work on Statistics without Tears! We’ve got a great speaker lined up with content that will be vital in your oncology pharmacy career. The sessions will be interactive and questions will be welcomed to help you with your statistical fears. We will run these on a monthly basis and the first one is free to all and then subsequently free to BOPA members. Rowntree says at the end If you feel I've raised more questions in your mind than I've answered, I shan't be surprised or apologetic. The library shelves groan with the weight of books in which you'll find answers to such questions (p185), although having said that to my eyes this is pretty comprehensive for a non-technical reader and the kinds of questions it has raised are not ones I require answers to. The book is clear and plainly explained with worked examples it is written in a seminar style - so the flow is interrupted by mini-questions. I was interested by one example which set out how by doing a single tailed analysis in a drugs trial you can potentially skew the presentation of the result to make a drug appear far more effective than it is ( Lies, damned lies and statistics afterall)A population is a complete set of people with a specialized set of characteristics, and a sample is a subset of the population. The usual criteria we use in defining population are geographic, for example, “the population of Uttar Pradesh”. In medical research, the criteria for population may be clinical, demographic and time related. Stat อย่างผม อ่านแล้วอยากจะดึงคนเขียนมาจุ๊บด้วยความขอบคุณสักที เป็นสถิติแบบที่ใช้เรียนตอนป.ตรีเลย แต่อธิบายด้วยภาษาคน และการใส่ตัวอย่างมาแบบไม่มีกั๊ก ทำให้เนื้อหาหลายๆ อย่างที่ตอนเรียนเรารู้สึกว่า "ทำไมมันนามธรรมจังวะ? ตกลงไอ้ที่เรากำลังคำนวณกันอยู่นี่มันคืออะไร?" เคลียร์ขึ้นมาเยอะเลย

Statistics without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians Statistics without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians

I have a rather irregular history with statistics. After disliking maths GCSE but getting a very good mark, I avoided A-level maths like the plague. Upon arriving at university as a fresh-faced undergrad, I was disconcerted to discover that the first year of my social science degree included a compulsory statistics module. I passed that, then chose modules with no maths for the remaining two years. My dissertation was entirely qualitative. When I returned to studying as postgrad years later, I’d grudgingly come to accept that statistics are useful. My masters course included two statistics modules, which I appreciated the purpose of without enjoying. Then somehow, during the peculiar derangement of my PhD, I ended up teaching myself to use a fairly complex statistical methodology: multinomial logistic regression. The majority of my PhD research was quantitative. Now I find myself actually teaching statistics to undergrads. My 18 year old self would be amazed and horrified. It’s quite possible that I’m still outgrowing an ingrained dislike of maths that has much more to do with uninspired school teaching than the subject itself. In any case, I have a decent grasp of what stats are and why they’re useful, by social science standards. Speaker: Sian Williams is a Senior Lecturer in Health Psychology and Pharmacy Practice at the University of Brighton. She has over 20 years experience of teaching statistics to undergraduates and postgraduates in a range of health professions and with a range of experience (and levels of statistics-phobia!).

Latest News

In many surveys, studies may be carried out on large populations which may be geographically quite dispersed. To obtain the required number of subjects for the study by a simple random sample method will require large costs and will be cumbersome. In such cases, clusters may be identified (e.g. households) and random samples of clusters will be included in the study; then, every member of the cluster will also be part of the study. This introduces two types of variations in the data – between clusters and within clusters – and this will have to be taken into account when analyzing data. To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. This is an excellent introduction to statistical thinking. The language used is conversational and easy to understand as you are guided through examples and ways of thinking about statistics.

Statistics without tears: Populations and samples - PMC Statistics without tears: Populations and samples - PMC

So why read this book? Because the undergrads I taught this term, and probably the postgrads I’ll teach next term, appear petrified and confused by quantitative methods. It’s so difficult to tell whether students are really grasping the concepts you explain in lectures, particularly when there’s no exam to test comprehension. These are social science students and their prior exposure to stats seems to have been minimal. When I spotted this book in library, I wondered if it could help me to explain the basics more clearly. And I think it just might. I found it very easy to follow and a helpful reminder. Rowntree’s explanation of the difference between parametric and non-parametric tests is especially lucid and useful. That said, I doubt I'll have time to include such careful and painstaking explanations in my lectures. I’ll definitely recommend the book to students, though. It’s not at all fashionable to suggest students read entire books, but honestly I think this one is much better than an explanatory video, the more trendy teaching medium. Concise introduction and refresher on statistics that is suitable for both math-intensive and non-math intensive majors. This is a chance to finally make (more?) sense out of what you've learnt in school, especially regarding the estimation of a population via sampling (e.g. standard error), how significant a result is (e.g. z-test, t-test). I consider this a must-read if you've ever taken postsecondary or college-level math (which would have covered the basic statistics mentioned in the book). When generalizing from observations made on a sample to a larger population, certain issues will dictate judgment. For example, generalizing from observations made on the mental health status of a sample of lawyers in Delhi to the mental health status of all lawyers in Delhi is a formalized procedure, in so far as the errors (sampling or random) which this may hazard can, to some extent, be calculated in advance. However, if we attempt to generalize further, for instance, about the mental statuses of all lawyers in the country as a whole, we hazard further pitfalls which cannot be specified in advance. We do not know to what extent the study sample and population of Delhi is typical of the larger population – that of the whole country – to which it belongs.

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. The choice of sampling methods is usually dictated by feasibility in terms of time and resources. Field research is quite messy and difficult like actual battle. It may be sometimes difficult to get a sample which is truly random. Most samples therefore tend to get biased. To estimate the magnitude of this bias, the researcher should have some idea about the population from which the sample is drawn. In conclusion, the following quote cited by Bradford Hill[ 4] elegantly sums up the benefit of random sampling: If cases of a disease are being ascertained through their attendance at a hospital outpatient department (OPD), rather than by field surveys in the community, it will be necessary to define the population according to the so-called catchment area of the hospital OPD. For administrative purposes, a dispensary, health center or hospital is usually considered to serve a population within a defined geographic area. But these catchment areas may only represent in a crude manner with the actual use of medical facilities by the local people. For example, in OPD study of psychiatric illnesses in a particular hospital with a defined catchment area, many people with psychiatric illnesses may not visit the particular OPD and may seek treatment from traditional healers or religious leaders.