Magna Carta: The Birth of Liberty

Product Information

Jones does have a tendency to make what seem like simple judgments on the rule of kings ('he was the worst. In 1776 American patriots, inspired by that long-ago defiance, dared to pick up arms against another English king and to demand even more far-reaching rights. citation needed] His son, Edward I, repeated the exercise in 1297, this time confirming it as part of England's statute law. This is a review of an advance reader's copy (ARC) provided by Viking Books through the Goodreads Giveaway program.

Although the volume of common law increased during that period, in particular during Henry II’s reign (which ended in 1189), no converse definition had been secured in regard to the financial liabilities of the baronage to the crown. Yet in the 800 years since its initial issue, it has threaded its way through a myriad of other documents, most notably the Declaration of Independence in 1776. A best-­selling historian with a popular touch — he has written and hosted TV mini-series based on his books — Jones skirts political legend and sticks largely to what is known. I sat with a good dictionary to discover the footnotes were on par with the dictionary definitions, being a word hound. Jones has brought the Plantagenets out of the shadows, revealing them in all their epic heroism and depravity.Through the pages Jones lays out a case for the rebellion of the barons against John’s rule and describes the results in vivid detail. Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. The book sets the events of 1215 and the Charter itself in the context of the law, politics and administration of England and Europe in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries.

In the Disney version of Robin Hood, there’s a ditty that goes like this: “Too late to be known as John the first, he’s sure to be known as John the worst. The fact is, the English monarch, John, broke his end of the bargain before the ink of the royal seal was dry. Really enjoyed Jones’ writing style and his focus on the crux of the matter at hand; so much so that I think I’ll gladly pick up a few more of his histories. As the conflict devolved into stalemate, King John died of dysentery leaving his 9 year old son Henry III on the throne. John's rule was a disaster, ranging from wily financial schemes and extortion practices created to garner funds for war against France, eruptive disagreements with Pope Innocent III which resulted in John being excommunicated, to violent conflicts with the landed aristocracy or tenants-in-chief: the barons, primarily over severe taxations levied upon them.

As the government’s national archive for England, Wales and the United Kingdom, The National Archives hold over 1,000 years of the nation’s records for everyone to discover and use. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. It seems a pity for that one to have slipped through the editorial net when King John is one of the major players.

This is a very well written narrow slice of English history about a document we have all heard of but know very little about. Yet studying the actual text of the document itself (which you can do without going to DC or England, thanks to the fact that the original 1215 charter is included in its entirety in Appendix A) shows that was not its purpose at all.

Definitely a good primer for the subject if you are vaguely interested in the history of this document- as a student of law, history, etc. The charter was a compromise, but it also contained important clauses designed to bring about reforms in judicial and local administration. He presents a leader who inherited primarily the bad aspects of ruling from his father with the exception of being a good administrator, an important trait for someone planning on taking as much as possible from his people. He doesn't seem to be very good at it as after five years he has lost virtually the whole of the continental empire and he bled the people of the realm for money to do it.

Sixteen years after John ascended to the throne of England, the landscape for all future leaders in the West would change as John conceded some of his power to the people. No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land. Originating as a peace treaty agreed between King John and a group of powerful barons at Runnymede near Windsor on 15 June 1215, it enshrined in law the concept of individual liberty and defined the role of the monarch towards the people. An easy-to-read chronicle, written in the form of nearly 40 newspaper articles, highlights historical actions such as the banning of slavery in Britain, women’s voting rights, and the end of Apartheid in South Africa. For one, it demonstrated that in England at least, the monarch was not powerful enough to completely dominate the political space and had to at least seek the approval of the important people of the nation for military efforts and taxation.He then goes into greater detail on King John, a son who joined in open rebellion against his father and had also conspired with the french king against his brother.