In 1776, the notion that no one is above the law was popular during the founding of the United States. For example, Thomas Paine wrote in his pamphlet Common Sense that "in America, the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other." [27] In 1780, John Adams enshrined this principle in Article VI of the Declaration of Rights in the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: The fourth element of the Rule of Law is the supremacy of legal authority. The law should rule officials, including judges, as well as ordinary citizens. The Rule of Law is deeply rooted in British values, which act as the core pillars of the United Kingdom's societal and political foundations. British values encompass democracy, the Rule of Law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs. These values permeate every aspect of British life, from the legal and political systems to daily interactions among citizens. In this context, the Rule of Law serves as an indispensable component of British values. The connection between the Rule of Law and British values is evident through various aspects:

Peerenboom, Randall (2004). "Rule of Law in France". Asian discourses of rule of law: theories and implementation of rule of law in twelve Asian countries, France and the U.S. (Digital printing.ed.). RoutledgeCurzon. p.81. ISBN 978-0-415-32612-4. All government officers of the United States, including the President, the Justices of the Supreme Court, state judges and legislators, and all members of Congress, pledge first and foremost to uphold the Constitution. These oaths affirm that the rule of law is superior to the rule of any human leader. [59] At the same time, the federal government has considerable discretion: the legislative branch is free to decide what statutes it will write, as long as it stays within its enumerated powers and respects the constitutionally protected rights of individuals. Likewise, the judicial branch has a degree of judicial discretion, [60] and the executive branch also has various discretionary powers including prosecutorial discretion. Per repeated opinions released by the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice, a sitting president cannot be indicted or prosecuted. [61] Application of precedent: The UK judicial system follows the Doctrine of Precedent, which means that courts make decisions based on previous rulings in similar cases. This practice promotes legal certainty and consistency, making the application of the Rule of Law predictable and impartial. Protection of individual liberties: The Rule of Law provides a legal framework that guarantees the protection of individual rights and freedoms, creating a society that respects personal choices and autonomy. The second element of the Rule of Law is efficacy. The law should actually guide people, at least for the most part. In Joseph Raz's phrase, "people should be ruled by the law and obey it."

Three Supremes, policy by which law is made subordinate to interests of the Chinese Communist Party The functional interpretation of the term "rule of law", consistent with the traditional English meaning, contrasts the "rule of law" with the " rule of man". [44] According to the functional view, a society in which government officers have a great deal of discretion has a low degree of "rule of law", whereas a society in which government officers have little discretion has a high degree of "rule of law". [44] Upholding the rule of law can sometimes require the punishment of those who commit offenses that are justifiable under natural law but not statutory law. [45] The rule of law is thus somewhat at odds with flexibility, even when flexibility may be preferable. [44] Letourneur, M.; Drago, R. (1958). "The Rule of Law as Understood in France". The American Journal of Comparative Law. 7 (2): 147–177. doi: 10.2307/837562. JSTOR 837562. We do not collect and/or retain the information about the property you submit to our property e-valuation tool. However, the information, data and property details you submit to our property e-valuation tool will be considered non-confidential and non-proprietary.

Equipping learners with the appropriate knowledge, values, attitudes, and behaviours they need to contribute to its continued improvement and regeneration in society more broadly. This can be reflected, for instance, in the way learners demand greater transparency in, or accountability of, public institutions, as well as through the everyday decisions that learners take as ethically responsible and engaged citizens, family members, workers, employers, friends, and consumers etc. [117] d) Which laws apply to this contract and where you may bring legal proceedings. These terms are governed by English law and you can bring legal proceedings in respect of our property e-valuation tool in the English courts. If you live in Scotland you can bring legal proceedings in respect of our property e-valuation tool in either the Scottish or the English courts. If you live in Northern Ireland you can bring legal proceedings in respect of our property e-valuation tool in either the Northern Irish or the English courts.We do not exclude or limit in any way our liability to you where it would be unlawful to do so. This includes liability for death or personal injury caused by our negligence or the negligence of our employees, agents or subcontractors; for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation; for breach of your legal rights in relation to our property e-valuation tool including the right to receive services which are as described and match information we provided to you about our property e-valuation tool and supplied with reasonable skill and care. https://www.bookbrowse.com/expressions/detail/index.cfm/expression_number/617/no-man-is-above-the-law Chen, Wang. "Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law Is a New Development and New Leap ..." CSIS Interpret: China. CSIS . Retrieved 24 September 2023. Shlaes, Amity, The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression, "The Rules of the Game and Economic Recovery".

Barry, Norman (2008). "Rule of Law". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp.445–447. doi: 10.4135/9781412965811.n273. ISBN 978-1412965804. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024. See also "The rule of law and the prosecutor". Attorney General's Office. 9 September 2013. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019 . Retrieved 20 November 2014. a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards. It requires, as well, measures to ensure adherence to the principles of supremacy of law, equality before the law, accountability to the law, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers, participation in decision-making, legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness and procedural and legal transparency.The rule of law is enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union as one of the common values for all Member States. Under the rule of law, all public powers always act within the constraints set out by law, in accordance with the values of democracy and fundamental rights, and under the control of independent and impartial courts. The rule of law includes principles such as legality, implying a transparent, accountable, democratic and pluralistic process for enacting laws; legal certainty; prohibiting the arbitrary exercise of executive power; effective judicial protection by independent and impartial courts, effective judicial review including respect for fundamental rights; separation of powers; and equality before the law. These principles have been recognised by the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. In addition, the Council of Europe has developed standards and issued opinions and recommendations which provide well-established guidance to promote and uphold the rule of law. [81] The Council of Europe [ edit ]

Education has an important role in promoting the rule of law (RoL) and a culture of lawfulness. In essence, it provides an important protective function by strengthening learners' abilities to face and overcome difficult life situations. Young people can be important contributors to a culture of lawfulness, and governments can provide educational support that nurtures positive values and attitudes in future generations. [117] Global Citizenship Education (GCE) is built on a lifelong learning perspective. It is not only for children and youth but also for adults. It can be delivered in formal, non-formal and informal settings. For this reason, GCE is part and parcel of the Sustainable Development Goal 4 on Education (SDG4, Target 4.7). A competency framework based on a vision of learning covers three domains to create a well-rounded learning experience: Cognitive, Socio-Emotional and Behavioural. [117]Accessible and Impartial Justice: justice is delivered timely by competent, ethical, and independent representatives and neutrals who are accessible, have adequate resources, and reflect the makeup of the communities they serve. In Thailand, a kingdom that has had a constitution since the initial attempt to overthrow the absolute monarchy system in 1932, the rule of law has been more of a principle than actual practice. [ citation needed] Ancient prejudices and political bias have been present in the three branches of government with each of their foundings, and justice has been processed formally according to the law but in fact more closely aligned with royalist principles that are still advocated in the 21st century. [ citation needed] In November 2013, Thailand faced still further threats to the rule of law when the executive branch rejected a supreme court decision over how to select senators. [ citation needed] Rule of law is a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the state itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced, and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights principles.