The move from TRIZ to SIT was motivated by the desire to create a method that is easier to learn and retain (achieved through a smaller number of rules and tools), more universal in application (achieved through elimination of engineering specific tools) and tighter in keeping the problem solver within a real inventive framework (the Closed World principle). Now, the testing done on the whole system after the integration is called the System Integration test. Here, the co-existence of a new system with an existing one is tested to ensure that the whole integrated system works fine. SIT Techniques

sit | Conjugate verb sit | Reverso Conjugator English Conjugation sit | Conjugate verb sit | Reverso Conjugator English

The process begins with an existing product (or service), continues with manipulating it systematically to create what SIT calls a "virtual product" (this is the form) and only then examines whether it satisfies existing or potential customer needs (function). Stubs are known as called programs. They act as dummy modules and perform the required module function in a limited manner. Systematic Inventive Thinking (SIT) is a thinking method developed in Israel in the mid-1990s. Derived from Genrich Altshuller's TRIZ engineering discipline, SIT is a practical approach to creativity, innovation and problem solving, which has become a well known methodology for innovation. Add to a product a component of the same type as an existing component. The added component should be changed in some way. The 2 keywords for this tool are: 1) more and 2) different. These represent the two stages for applying the tool: 1) add more copies of something that exists in the product and 2) change those copies according to some parameter.If there is no bug and the test cases have passed then the project can be put to sign off and sent for production. Also, there will be a high chance of occurrence of the critical bugs in the production environment.

What Is The Difference Between SIT Vs UAT Testing?

Such widely known methods as brainstorming, synectics, random stimulation and lateral thinking (identified with Edward de Bono) can be traced to this approach. More recent studies reveal the appearance of a different approach. These studies show that the main difficulty faced by problem solvers is not generating a large quantity of ideas but coming up with original ones. The former parallel drawn between quantity and quality appears to no longer hold true. It was discovered that a large flow of ideas does not necessarily lead to the creation of original ones and further, that the very occupation with ordinary ideas may actually hamper creativity and innovative thought. [3] [4] The qualitative-change principle dictates that solutions can be found where the main problem element or variable in the existing situation is either totally eliminated or even reversed. The difference between TRIZ and SIT in this respect is that in SIT the Closed World condition is the most important principle. This is particularly applicable when the template approach is applied to problem solving. Goldenberg, J.; Lehmann D.; Mazursky D. (2001). "The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success". Management Science. 47 (1): 69–84. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.69.10670. JSTOR 2661560.Most ideas for new products are either uninspired or impractical. Finding the "sweet spot" requires a balance that leads to both ingenious and viable ideas. This notion was expressed in a Harvard Business Review Article entitles "Finding Your Innovation Sweet Spot". [8] The main function of SIT is to do test dependencies between different system components and hence, regression testing is an important part of SIT. Goldenberg, J.; Mazursky D.; Solomon S. (1999). "Creative Sparks". Science. 285 (5433): 1495–1496. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5433.1495. S2CID 154451030. Once the cluster is tested, the driver is removed, and the cluster is combined with the next upper level. This process goes on until the whole application structure is achieved.